October Reads – a Quieter Month

P1020878October has been a quiet month in terms of reading – both in terms of quantity and quality.  Two weeks of holiday (including a trip to Paris and a week of house-guests) have left their mark. Incidentally, I’ve noticed that a day without reading feels really empty and unsatisfactory, no matter how busy I was with other things.

It has also been a month with fewer reviews – or perhaps I am just settling into my new reading principles. I have completed my reading challenge of 150 books this year and am now reading more for pleasure and allowing myself the freedom of NOT reviewing books unless I feel strongly about them.

3 books in French:

Grégoire Delacourt: On ne voyait que le bonheur

Joseph Incardona: 220 Volts – a post on this author and some other French male authors will follow shortly

Daniel Pennac: La Feé Carabine

I exceeded my self-imposed target of one book in French per month, and I enjoyed all three of them. In fact, they were probably my joint best reads of the month

1 translation from Finnish:

Kati Hiekkapelto: The Hummingbird

All of the remaining books were good reads, enjoyable to pass a few hours, but nothing really stood out for me.

3 crime novels set in the UK:

Rachel Abbott: Sleep Tight

James Runcie: Sidney Chambers and the Perils of the Night – upon which the Grantchester series on British TV is based

Kate Rhodes: Crossbones Yard – discussed at our Crime Book Club

1 book set in Peru: 

Natalia Sylvester: Chasing the Sun

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “October Reads – a Quieter Month”

  1. Sometimes quiet months can be good too, Marina Sofia. And you do have a nice variety of interesting reads there. I like it too that you’ve decided to do more of the kind of reading you want to do. I think if you don’t focus (at least some of the time) on reading just because you want to read a certain book, then reading becomes a chore.

    1. There were still some books on the list that were ‘required reading’, such as The Hummingbird and Crossbones Yard, but it has been a relief to be able to choose books much more randomly. More guided by mood than wisdom or ‘ought to, should have’.

  2. I agree with Margot, I think it’s great that you are now reading books that you want to read and are taking enjoyment in reading. It’s not about the speed we can read – though I often wish I could read faster as there are so many great books out there! – but about the enjoyment we get from the books. That’s why we read them after all.

    1. It’s interesting though that some of the books I chose ‘freely’ this month were actually average rather than outstanding. Clearly ‘mood’ is not always the best predictor of quality…

Do share your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s