#EU27Project – France: Leila Slimani

Leila Slimani: Chanson Douce – Lullaby (trans. Sam Taylor)

I was delighted when I heard that a young woman of Moroccan origin had won the Goncourt Prize in 2016 for a novel about domestic life, even though I had not read it yet. This is because the  most prestigious literary prize in France is often given to middle-aged white men writing about worthy and very earnest subjects (usually the Second World War). So it was fun to imagine the mysognistic, rather pompous Goncourt brothers turning in their grave.

Since then, I have read the prize-winning book in both French and English (although I still have to read Slimani’s first book Dans le jardin de l’ogre) and have heard mixed reactions to it, particularly in the English-speaking world. I think there are two reasons for that. First, the way it has been marketed as a novel of suspense, a thriller, the next Gone Girl (you should be ashamed of yourself, Daily Telegraph). Secondly, the deceptively simple style, which can come across as rather flat, particularly in translation.

So let me tackle the first issue. There is no suspense. We know from the first sentence that the children have died. We know by the end of the first few paragraphs that the nanny has done it. The rest of the book is about understanding what led up to it, but not a thriller, so it is not about getting clear closure or simple cause and effect.

Myriam and Paul are an average bourgeois couple with two young children, both working, both trying to make a go of combining career and family in Paris in a flat that is probably slightly too small. They hire a day nanny, Louise, to look after the children and at first she seems perfect: small, neat, prim, always available, always patient. But Louise has a lonely life and is far too involved in her employers’ affairs. In such cases, it is too simple to point to mental illness or a single cause for the crime. In fact, as in Ruth Rendell’s A Judgement in Stone (which has a similar structure of starting with the outcome), there may be a main reason but there are many contributing factors and there are no clearcut answers. This book poses more questions than it answers, with the result that many readers complain that they thought it ended too abruptly or that there was a chunk missing. All of the people in the book whose lives have intersected with Louise’s, however tangentially, feel that if they’d done something differently, this tragedy might not have happened, but in fact there is nothing to indicate that this would be true. There is the inescapable sense of Greek tragedy and fate, of Moira, about it all. A young man who had been looked after as a child by Louise realises:

.. what he first felt earlier, when the policewoman told them, was not shock or surprise but an immense and painful relief. A feeling of jubilation, even. As if he’d always know that some menace had hung over him, a pale, sulphurous, unspeakable menace… Fate had decreed that the calamity would strike elsewhere.

Furthermore, the book is not about whodunnit or even whydunnit, but about issues of class, social divisions, parental pressures, conflicted maternal sentiments, loneliness and fear of abandonment. The countless minute humiliations, anxieties and cruel blows of fate that Louise is subjected to (from the tax office hounding her to the rotten shower cubicle to the well-intentioned but insensitive treatment by her employers) would damage even a stronger person. Add to that her dissatisfaction with her own family, her estrangement from her daughter and the way she used to be mercilessly teased by her deceased husband about her job, which is only fit for ‘illegal foreigners’. Her job isolates her still further, as she has no one but the children to talk with, and the playground nannies’ support network does not apply to her, since she is indeed one of the few white French women doing the job. Above all, Louise is a victim o her own aspirations to be a good bourgeois housewife and mother: she perceives Paul and Myriam initially as the perfect family and cannot forgive them for not living up to that ideal.

Author photo from Le Parisien.

The second, stylistic issue does owe something to the translation. As with Japanese books, I have noticed that when German or French books are written in a very unadorned style and then translated into English, they can sound a bit too bare, almost trite. Slimani admits that she was deliberately following the tradition of Camus and Marguerite Duras, aiming for a very simple style. ‘When the thoughts and concepts are confusing and complex, you need a very simple style or else you will overwhelm the reader.’ This is the transparent style of allowing words and deeds to speak for themselves rather than going too deep inside a character’s motivation (think Camus’ L’Étranger or Jean-Patrick Manchette’s Fatale). The very opposite of the voluble, ornate style of the Spanish and Italian (or even Norwegian) authors who have recently become popular. So perhaps she is counter-fashion at the moment. Yet still winning all the prizes and recognition.


18 thoughts on “#EU27Project – France: Leila Slimani”

  1. Thanks,Marina. I enjoyed this book – it was a fast read due I think to the simple style Slimani talks about but in that simple style she’s created quite a powerful portrait of Louise’s despair.

    1. It certainly doesn’t give clear answers, but then do we ever get clear answers when there are such tragedies? We always end up saying that they must have been either mad or evil. Slimani offers an alternative here, without excusing it.

  2. You’ve piqued my interest, Marina, and I’ll be seeking out this book. I love reading reviews and discovering books I didn’t know I wanted to read! 🙂 x

    1. I would love to hear what you think of it if you do get to read it. I think it will get quite a buzz, because it is being marketed as a literary thriller, but don’t be put off by the buzz.

  3. And that’s what happens when blurbs misrepresent a book, Marina Sofia. I really find that annoying. I’ve heard fine things about this book, though, and my interest is definitely piqued. There are some novels that do draw you in just by a simple exploration of the different lives that are woven together at the time of a key event/tragedy. This sounds like one of them.

    1. As someone who has had a cleaner and felt like cringing every time she came over, I certainly thought it said a lot about class and well-meaning liberalism, as well as so much else.

  4. oh, such a lovely review. really enjoyed reading it. have always meant to read her but never got around to it.

  5. After reading this very slim novel with few ideas and only one trajectory, I wonder how this book could have won the Prix Goncourt. I hope this doesn’t signal a dumbing down of French culture.

    1. It certainly is very different from other Goncourt winners, but I thought it was quite a subtle book, with many layers to it, which could be read at different levels. It might not be like Romain Gary or Mathias Enard, but it certainly can stand alongside Pierre Lemaitre or even Duras’ L’Amant.

  6. Such a lazy comparison from the Telegraph, made without having read the book by the sound of it. Was it made in the press release? The structure sounds much more interesting than a strightforward thriler, more a psyschological study. And I’m interested by what you say about the translation, something I’d wondered about with Japanese books.

    1. Sadly, Faber put that blurb on the back of their book. I queried Leila Slimani about it and she admitted she was embarrassed: ‘n’a rien à voir avec Gone Girl’.

      1. Oh, dear! I remember the constant litany of comparison with Captain Corelli’s Mandolin by publishers when I was a bookseller, usually met with a cynical sneer by me. It’s so unfair to the author.

  7. Great review Marina Sofia. The comparison with Gone Girl would put me off (simply through its overuse, it becomes white noise!) but you’ve piqued my interest. I like a simple writing style 🙂

    1. Yes, I thought publishers would be over that comparison by now… Not at ALL like Gone Girl (even though I quite enjoyed that, though not all of the copycat novels that followed).

Do share your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.