Let me introduce you today to homes of famous writers or artists, which no longer function as homes. In most cases, they’ve been pulled down to make way for progress, but not before bankrupting their owners.
Fortunately, some houses escaped this fate, even though the owner had to sell them to pay off debts. Alexandre Dumas, for instance, overreached himself when he built a magnificent chateau (known as the Chateau de Monte-Cristo) just outside Paris, including a little island with the most ambitious ‘writing shed’ in history.
While researching this picture, I found so many pictures of other stately homes which were demolished (the 1960s and 70s seem to have been particularly vicious decades) because the owners couldn’t afford them anymore.
These are all lovely in their own way, Marina Sofia! That home in Evian is especially lovely. Such a shame some of these were torn down, with all of their memories of creativity.
Except maybe for the bunker, what a pity, and good thing delightful Chateau d’If was spared! Reading about all this demolishing sounds extravagant when you live in Italy where nothing ever gets demolished – even obvious eyesores last forever just because they’ve “always been there”: nobody dares change anything …
Well some of those are not particularly attractive but Mark Bernstein’s looks wonderful and I think I could be a very happy resident of Dumas’ little pile
I love all the buildings and history you’ve shared! The story I’m working on is about a town hidden from the eyes of present day people, it looks abandoned. But to a few select persons, it’s a living beautiful place. I’ll be using some of these for ideas! Thanks for sharing.
The Simenon house was hideous and suitably bleak. No great loss. Pity about the Bowie house, though. Some of the others are lovely, too. Interesting post! X
There’s a few of these that I’m not too sorry have gone – in fact, I might have volunteered to help pull down Simenon’s! But Haddon Hall looks like it would have been worth saving even without the Bowie connection…
I like them all except Simenon house which was really ugly and what a shame that they were pulled down. The picture of the house where David Bowie lived and created particularly evokes another age without being a ‘classic’ mansion.
Ah, you can have the Dumas shed. Yes it is lovely but I have all of nature just outside my door and minutes away the Mediterranean. What more could one ask for? Thank you Marina, they were delightful to see and I am glad the Dumas estate was rescued. It says a lot about those who would destroy national treasures for…
I’m not surprised the locals weren’t too keen on Simenon’s house. Such a shame about the Bernstein, though. It looks lovely.
Especially when you bear in mind that before building that monstrosity, Simenon used to live in this rather charming chateau near Lausanne.
http://www.swisscastles.ch/Vaud/chateau/echandens.html
How odd! I
Tragedy! We do tend not to preserve what should be saved – particularly the Bowen house. How sad…
While researching this picture, I found so many pictures of other stately homes which were demolished (the 1960s and 70s seem to have been particularly vicious decades) because the owners couldn’t afford them anymore.
These are all lovely in their own way, Marina Sofia! That home in Evian is especially lovely. Such a shame some of these were torn down, with all of their memories of creativity.
Luckily, most local authorities are getting better at preserving houses with such creative associations. Although the LA story was very recent indeed!
I can actually see the point of Dumas’s writing studio. I’ve told my wife I want one just like it. Now.
I don’t know how we can seriously be expected to write or read or blog without a similar modest shed in the back garden!
Precisely the point I made to her. She said she’d “think about it.”
Except maybe for the bunker, what a pity, and good thing delightful Chateau d’If was spared! Reading about all this demolishing sounds extravagant when you live in Italy where nothing ever gets demolished – even obvious eyesores last forever just because they’ve “always been there”: nobody dares change anything …
Well some of those are not particularly attractive but Mark Bernstein’s looks wonderful and I think I could be a very happy resident of Dumas’ little pile
I love all the buildings and history you’ve shared! The story I’m working on is about a town hidden from the eyes of present day people, it looks abandoned. But to a few select persons, it’s a living beautiful place. I’ll be using some of these for ideas! Thanks for sharing.
That sounds intriguing! Glad you enjoyed these stories/pictures.
The Simenon house was hideous and suitably bleak. No great loss. Pity about the Bowie house, though. Some of the others are lovely, too. Interesting post! X
There’s a few of these that I’m not too sorry have gone – in fact, I might have volunteered to help pull down Simenon’s! But Haddon Hall looks like it would have been worth saving even without the Bowie connection…
What a shame about the Bernstein house, it looks absolutely gorgeous. Glad the Dumas “shed” was saved! What an adorable confection!
We don’t appreciate modern architecture enough at times, do we? And I don’t mean the ‘glory’ that is the self-designed Simenon bunker!
Shame really–except for the Simenon house which is butt ugly.
have you seen photos of the Jayne Mansfield mansion–same fate…
I like them all except Simenon house which was really ugly and what a shame that they were pulled down. The picture of the house where David Bowie lived and created particularly evokes another age without being a ‘classic’ mansion.
Ah, you can have the Dumas shed. Yes it is lovely but I have all of nature just outside my door and minutes away the Mediterranean. What more could one ask for? Thank you Marina, they were delightful to see and I am glad the Dumas estate was rescued. It says a lot about those who would destroy national treasures for…